Sphera vs Assent which one covers your EPR duties in 2026

Stella Winther Stella Winther
12 min read

Sphera and Assent both sell packaging EPR software to manufacturers, but one runs the filings across more than 360 schemes while the other collects the packaging data your suppliers hold. Here is what each company publishes on coverage, filing, PPWR and price.

The Sphera and Assent logos on two identical ivory travel cases against deep green

Sphera and Assent both sell packaging EPR software to manufacturers, but the ground each one publishes is not the same. Sphera name three waste streams and more than 360 compliance schemes worldwide. Assent name packaging, and the only laws on their EPR page are four North American ones.

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is the duty to register, report and pay for the packaging you put on a market. Sphera vs Assent is really a question of which part of that duty you need help with, so this page compares them on coverage, filing, supplier data, PPWR and price.

The slice of EPR each product covers

Both companies use the same three letters for a job that has three separate parts. Working out which part you are actually short of is what separates these two products.

  1. Finding the obligation. Which registers you belong in, in which countries, for which streams.
  2. Getting the data. What your packaging weighs, what it is made of, how much recycled content it holds.
  3. Filing and paying. Submitting the numbers to each scheme and settling the fees.

Sphera lead on the first and third, finding the duty and then discharging it. Their own sub-headline reads "All your company's Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) obligations and green fee recycling payments are managed in one place".

Their consultants do the arranging, across packaging, batteries and waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE).

Assent lead on the second, getting the data. Theirs reads "collect packaging data and generate report-ready outputs with fee estimations", with the collecting aimed at your suppliers.

That is the whole comparison in one line. One company is built to take the filing off your desk, the other is built to find the packaging data your filing depends on.

Sphera sell a service with a platform attached

Sphera's EPR product is called Recycling Compliance, and the platform behind it is EC4P.

The Sphera Recycling Compliance page, headed Recycling Compliance EC4P, with the line that all your company's Extended Producer Responsibility obligations and green fee recycling payments are managed in one place
The Sphera Recycling Compliance page in August 2026, where the only call to action is Request a demo.

The page describes a service rather than a subscription, and it is explicit about the division of labour.

  1. Their consultants find the duties. They "quickly and accurately identify your legal obligations", then set up the arrangements "in each country on your behalf".
  2. They file. In their words, "We carry out your registration and reporting".
  3. They can pay the fees. Sphera "can pay recycling fees on your behalf providing you with one invoice for your whole recycling compliance program".
  4. You sign and you type. "All you need to do is sign the registration documents and enter your product data into our secure EC4P cloud platform."

There is no software-only tier advertised, so the consultants are part of what you buy. Sphera's own figures put this at "more than 650 companies across 18 countries", with "45+ regulatory, industry content and data experts" behind it.

The testimonials on their EPR page come from FLIR, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Brainlab and Takeda, so the customers they show are electronics and medical manufacturers.

Inside Sphera, EPR sits in Product Stewardship, next to chemical management, hazardous materials, life cycle assessment and safety data sheets. Sphera Solutions has been a Blackstone portfolio company since 2021.

Assent sell a data engine with reporting on top

Assent's EPR product is a module of a much wider platform they call the Assent Product Intelligence Network.

The Assent EPR Packaging Software for Manufacturers page, describing an AI-native solution that collects packaging data and generates report-ready outputs with fee estimations
The Assent EPR packaging page in August 2026, where the two calls to action are Book a Demo and Get a Quote.

The product is built around a problem most manufacturers recognise, which is that nobody inside the company knows what the packaging is made of. Assent go looking for it.

  1. They chase your suppliers. The page promises to "engage even the hardest-to-reach suppliers with multilingual education and 1:1 support", through tailored information requests.
  2. They pull specific attributes. Materials, weights and post-consumer recycled (PCR) content percentage, per stock keeping unit (SKU).
  3. They show you the holes. The product identifies material and supplier data gaps, which is the part a spreadsheet never does.
  4. They estimate and format. Eco-modulated fees are estimated, and the output is a jurisdiction-specific report you can file.

Around that module sit Assent's other duties, and they are the reason a manufacturer usually meets Assent in the first place. Product material compliance covers RoHS, REACH, TSCA, PFAS and SCIP.

The wider suite covers carbon border rules, deforestation, sustainability reporting, conflict minerals, digital product passports and product carbon footprints.

The industries Assent name are medical devices, industrial equipment, aerospace and defence, electronics and automotive, all of them businesses with long bills of materials. They have been headquartered in Ottawa since 2010, with offices in Columbus, Amsterdam, Penang, Eldoret and Pune.

Sphera and Assent on what each one publishes

The table below only records what each company states on their own site, starting with the rows you can count and ending with the rows where neither of them publishes anything.

What each one publishes Sphera Assent
Compliance schemes named "over 360 compliance schemes worldwide" no scheme or country count published
Waste streams named packaging, WEEE, batteries packaging
Laws named by name none named on the EPR page California SB54, Oregon SB582, Colorado HB22-1355, Canada's Federal Plastics Registry
Platform name EC4P Assent Product Intelligence Network
Registration and reporting "We carry out your registration and reporting" report-ready outputs, plus "optional EPR execution services"
Scheme fees can be paid on your behalf, on one invoice estimated, not paid
Supplier data collection a separate Plastic Packaging Assessment under supplier engagement the core of the EPR product, multilingual
PPWR one blog post, no PPWR product page a full PPWR solution page
What EPR sits beside chemicals, hazardous materials, life cycle assessment, safety data sheets material compliance, trade compliance, carbon and due-diligence duties
How it is delivered consultants plus a platform, no software-only tier software, with services offered as an option
Textiles not listed not listed
Price not published, demo only not published, demo or quote only

Three waste streams and two different maps

The two rows most likely to decide this for you are the stream list and the map, and they point in opposite directions.

Sphera name three streams and Assent name one

Sphera's positioning line is "Global WEEE, Batteries & Packaging Compliance", so packaging, electronics and batteries are handled by the same team and land on the same invoice. If you put a powered device in a box, you are usually registering three times in every country you sell in.

Assent's EPR product is packaging. Their battery work is a separate solution for the EU Batteries Regulation, and that page covers due diligence, a raw materials policy, labelling and end-of-life duties.

It does not name producer registration or battery scheme reporting, which is a different job from the WEEE and battery reporting a multi-stream producer files each year. Neither company lists textiles.

Sphera publish a number and Assent publish four laws

Sphera put a figure on their reach, "over 360 compliance schemes worldwide". That is a bigger number than any other EPR vendor we have checked puts in writing.

Assent publish no scheme count and no country count. The four laws they do name are California SB54, Oregon SB582, Colorado HB22-1355 and Canada's Federal Plastics Registry, so their EPR page is written for a North American obligation.

Their European packaging work appears through the PPWR product further down this page instead.

Three rings showing EPR stream coverage. The inner ring is packaging and holds Assent, the middle ring adds WEEE, and the outer ring adds batteries and holds Sphera

More streams is not the same as a better fit. A producer who only sells packaged goods into California is buying nothing with the WEEE and battery reach, and a producer who registers electronics in fourteen countries cannot use a packaging-only product at all.

Who does the filing and who pays the fees

This is the sharpest published difference between them, and it is worth quoting rather than paraphrasing.

Sphera say "We carry out your registration and reporting", and they can "pay recycling fees on your behalf providing you with one invoice for your whole recycling compliance program". That is one supplier invoice instead of a pile of scheme statements.

Assent do not make that claim on their EPR page. Their outputs are "report-ready", which means the report is prepared and someone on your side submits it.

Their PPWR page does name "optional EPR execution services to help manage reporting complexity", so execution exists as an add-on rather than as the model.

The practical difference lands in two places.

  1. Who logs into the portal. With Sphera it is them. With Assent it is you, unless you buy the optional service.
  2. Who is holding the money. Sphera can settle the fees and bill you once, so the fee calculation becomes their problem. Assent estimate the fees so you can budget, and the payment stays yours.

If cash flow or a finance-team preference is driving the decision, ask each of them who the scheme invoices are addressed to. That answer is not on either website.

Both companies go to your suppliers for different reasons

Assent are not the only one of the two sending questionnaires to suppliers, so it is worth being precise about what each collection effort is for.

Assent collect the attributes the report needs

Assent's supplier work feeds the filing. The engine chases the suppliers who ignore surveys, in their words with "multilingual education and 1:1 support", and what comes back is the materials, weights and recycled content that a packaging submission needs.

Sphera survey suppliers about circularity instead

Sphera also send questionnaires, through a Plastic Packaging Assessment that sits under supplier engagement rather than under the EPR product.

Their page for it describes understanding "your suppliers' use of plastic in their packaging" and benchmarking suppliers on recycled content and reusable weight. The stated purpose is circular economy commitments such as the New Plastics Economy initiative.

That page names no regulation, no scheme and no reporting duty. So both companies can reach your suppliers, but only Assent tie that collection to the compliance filing itself.

If your packaging specification lives with a contract manufacturer who has never answered a survey, that distinction is the one that matters.

Only Assent sells a PPWR product today

The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) started applying on 12 August 2026, and it is the reason many packaging teams are shopping at all this year.

Assent publish a PPWR solution page, headed "EU Packaging & Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) Compliance Solution". These are the duties it names.

  1. Substances of concern, including the REACH substances of very high concern and persistent organic pollutants.
  2. Recycled content verification, which needs a number per material rather than a claim.
  3. Labelling and documentation, kept as audit-ready records as the rules develop through delegated and implementing acts.
  4. EPR alignment, meaning the same packaging data feeds the EPR reports.

Their page does not mention the Declaration of Conformity, which is the document PPWR itself requires.

Sphera write about PPWR but do not sell it as a product. Searching their site in August 2026 turns up one blog post, "Countdown to PPWR: What companies can do to prepare", and no PPWR solution page.

That is not the same as saying they cannot help, and their consultants may well cover it on a call, but there is nothing published to compare.

If PPWR is the deadline in front of you, read our PPWR software comparison and the rules for plastic packaging before either demo, so you can tell a data product from a declaration product.

What you can learn about price before you talk to sales

Neither company publishes a number, so the honest answer is that you cannot compare price without two sales calls.

Sphera give one route in, which is "Request a demo". Assent give two, "Book a Demo" and "Get a Quote", and although their pages link to pricing, there is no pricing page on their site to land on.

Both are enterprise purchases, and if your shortlist is still open, our enterprise EPR software comparison covers the other names in this bracket.

Because the models differ, the same quote question produces very different answers, so ask all four of these.

  1. What is in the licence and what is a service line. Sphera's consultants are part of the product. Assent's execution services are an option.
  2. Whether scheme fees pass through you or through them. One invoice from Sphera is not the same thing as your own scheme invoices.
  3. What a new country or a new stream costs. Neither company publishes how reach is priced, so ask whether 360 schemes worldwide means 360 schemes in your quote.
  4. How supplier outreach is counted. Assent's product is built around chasing suppliers, so ask whether the length of your supplier list changes what you pay.

Start from your stream list then your map

Neither of these is the better product. They answer different questions, so the fastest way through is to read your own situation off the list below.

  1. You register packaging, electronics and batteries. Only Sphera name all three streams in one place.
  2. Your packaging obligations are in California, Oregon, Colorado or Canada. Those are the four laws Assent name on the page.
  3. You do not know what your packaging is made of. Assent's whole product is built to get that out of your suppliers.
  4. You want the registrations, the filings and the fees off your desk. That is Sphera's published model, consultants included.
  5. PPWR is your nearest deadline. Assent publish a product for it, Sphera publish an article.
  6. You have both problems. Plenty of manufacturers do, and nothing in either company's material rules out buying the data work from one and the filing from the other.

If you would rather run the filings yourself

Both of these models put a vendor between you and the schemes, and both quote per customer. Some producers want the opposite, which is to keep the workflow in their own hands and see the price before a call.

That is the gap our own product sits in, so treat this section as the one place on the page where we have a stake. Two of the three Repax products are live today.

  1. Core is EPR reporting you run yourself, with a free tier at 0 EUR a month and paid plans from 29 EUR (ex VAT, as of July 2026).
  2. Declare handles the packaging Declaration of Conformity that PPWR asks for. A third product, Comply, registers you and files for you across EU markets.

We also keep a page on Sphera alternatives and one on Assent alternatives if you want the wider field rather than these two.

It is a different shape of purchase, not a bigger one. If you need consultants in fourteen countries, or an engine that will chase hundreds of suppliers in their own languages until they answer, the two companies above are built for that and we are not.

Frequently asked questions about Sphera and Assent

The questions below come up most often when a manufacturer has both names on a shortlist.

Is Sphera or Assent better for EPR compliance?

Neither is better across the board, because they sell different halves of the job. Sphera carry out registration and reporting and can pay the scheme fees across packaging, WEEE and batteries. Assent collect packaging data from your suppliers and return report-ready outputs with fee estimates.

Does Sphera or Assent pay your EPR fees?

Sphera state that they can pay recycling fees on your behalf and bill you on one invoice for the whole programme. Assent estimate eco-modulated fees so you can budget for them, and make no claim about paying them.

Which one covers WEEE and battery EPR?

Sphera name packaging, WEEE and batteries together. Assent's EPR product is packaging, and their EU Batteries Regulation solution covers due diligence and labelling rather than registering as a battery producer. Neither company lists textiles.

Do Sphera and Assent publish pricing?

No. Sphera ask you to request a demo, and Assent ask you to book a demo or get a quote, with no pricing page on either site as of August 2026. Both are quoted per customer.

Which one is ready for PPWR?

Assent publish a PPWR compliance solution covering substances of concern, recycled content verification, labelling and documentation. Sphera publish a PPWR blog post and no PPWR product page. Neither page mentions issuing the PPWR Declaration of Conformity.

Can you use both companies at once?

Nothing published by either company rules it out, and the two do different work, so you could run supplier data collection in one and the filings in the other. Neither names an integration with the other, so assume the handover is a spreadsheet export.

Written by

EPR content curator

I write about Extended Producer Responsibility, which is exactly as glamorous as it sounds. Someone has to translate it for human beings. That someone is me.