prduct.com is a Danish supply chain and compliance platform. Their software pulls product and supplier data into one place and tracks it against a dozen EU and national regulations, Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) among them.
This guide compares six prduct.com alternatives on what they cover, how far they carry the compliance work, and what they cost. Some are broad platforms like prduct.com. Others take one part of the job all the way to the end.
What prduct.com does with your compliance data
prduct.com is built around the supply chain rather than around a single regulation. The company is based in Aarhus, works in Danish and English, and names customers including BoConcept, BOLIA, Fredericia, HOLMRIS B8, REMA 1000 and Dagrofa.
The platform has three parts. Supplier relationship management handles the people who send you data, product information management holds the product records themselves, and compliance and risk management maps those records to the regulations that apply.
The regulation list is long. Each of these has its own page on their site.
- Deforestation and due diligence. The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), the Forced Labour Product Ban, the Norwegian Transparency Act and the German Supply Chain Act.
- Substances and product design. REACH, the Digital Product Passport and the Right to Repair Directive.
- Waste and reporting. Packaging and packaging waste (PPW), the Waste Framework Directive, EPR and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
That breadth is the reason to buy it, and also the reason people compare it against something narrower. On EPR and packaging, prduct.com's own pages describe a documentation job rather than a filing job.
They talk about simplifying data collection across the supply chain, consolidating supplier information and packaging specifications, tracking packaging composition and recyclability, documenting EPR obligations, and generating audit-ready documentation for national and EU authorities.
What those pages do not offer is the last stretch. There is no published feature for calculating what you owe a scheme country by country, no scheme registration, and no submission of the EPR declaration itself.
There is also no EU Declaration of Conformity tool for packaging, which is the other document an EU producer needs from August 2026.
So the data is in good order and the return is still yours to work out. Pricing follows the same pattern as most of this market, with a free way in and a demo or a conversation for anything past that.
Every alternative below can be placed by one question. How far through the EPR job does it actually take you?
How each of the six alternatives works
Two of these are broad compliance platforms in the same shape as prduct.com. Four are built around the reporting itself, and they differ on how many waste streams they carry and how much of the filing they take off your desk.
Each entry covers what the tool is, who it suits, and the one reason to pick it over prduct.com.
1. Complir
Complir is the closest like-for-like, another Copenhagen-based platform selling one place for product compliance across many markets. They describe themselves as the AI infrastructure for product compliance, and their promise is launching compliant products without the bottleneck.
They monitor regulations across more than 40 markets, covering bodies such as ECHA, ANSES and BfR in Europe, the FDA and CPSC in the US and OPSS in the UK. AI agents draft the compliance documentation and risk assessments, and there are native Adobe Illustrator and InDesign plugins for label work.
The gap worth knowing is scope. Complir's own framework list is about product safety, chemicals and labelling, and it does not name EPR or packaging waste. So this is a swap when your bottleneck is getting products cleared for sale, not when it is the EPR return. Pricing is demo-only.
Choose it over prduct.com if your hard part is product safety and labelling across many markets, and you want AI drafting the documentation.
2. Repax
Repax is an EPR platform you run yourself, and it starts where prduct.com stops.
You describe each product and its packaging once, and that record answers whatever the next scheme or market asks for.
It is also our own product, so we lead with it, though we are straight about where each rival wins. Two parts are live today.
Core is the product spec database and report builder. It turns one product record into the report a scheme actually asks for, with the right categories, material types and tiers per market.
Declare issues signed EU Declarations of Conformity for packaging under the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), complete with unique numbers, QR codes and a versioned archive.
Here is the honest gap. Core prepares the filing, and submission to each scheme or national register still happens outside Core today. The product that will take that over, Comply, is still being built.
What you get in exchange is depth on the reporting itself and a price you can read. More than one waste stream sits on the same product record, packaging, batteries and electronics included.
Each shipped order also locks in the spec at the moment of sale, so old filings stay correct when the catalogue changes.
Repax pricing is public, which is rare here. Core and Declare each have a free tier at 0 EUR a month, Growth at 29 EUR, Pro at 59 EUR and a custom enterprise tier for high volume (ex VAT, as of August 2026).
Choose it over prduct.com if the EPR return is the part that hurts and you want the numbers, the report and the packaging declaration produced rather than documented.
3. Recyda
Recyda is the packaging specialist of this group, and the one that goes furthest on packaging alone. The German platform centralises packaging data to automate EPR reporting, assess recyclability and get a portfolio ready for PPWR.
Their EPR side calculates costs automatically against country-specific rules across more than 20 countries, then produces declaration reports carrying the data a given scheme expects.
On PPWR they generate both the Declaration of Conformity and a summary of the Annex VII technical documentation that has to sit behind it.
Recyclability is where they are unusual. They put each pack through a recyclability assessment against the German and European yardsticks for it, the ZSVR minimum standard and EN 18120. That matters because EPR fees are increasingly modulated by how recyclable a pack is.
The trade-off is focus, since packaging is all they cover, and pricing is demo-only.
Choose it over prduct.com if packaging is your whole obligation and you want recyclability scoring driving the fee work.
4. Assent
Assent is the option that most resembles prduct.com's supplier-first thinking, at enterprise scale. Their EPR packaging product is pitched as an AI-native solution for manufacturers with limited visibility into their global packaging supply chains.
The engine room is supplier engagement. Assent chases the suppliers who never answer, in their own languages and with one-to-one support, and pulls back packaging attributes such as materials, weights and recycled content percentages.
From that data they generate report-ready outputs with fee estimations and jurisdiction-specific reports.
Geography is the thing to check. Their EPR packaging page is anchored in North American law, naming California SB54, Oregon SB582, Colorado HB22-1355 and Canada's Federal Plastics Registry, and it covers packaging rather than batteries or electronics. Pricing is demo-only.
Choose it over prduct.com if your packaging data lives with hundreds of suppliers who need chasing, especially for North American packaging law.
5. Lorax EPI
Lorax EPI is a pure-play EPR specialist, so it is the narrowest tool here and the deepest on schemes. They describe their job as managing the complexity of product and packaging compliance, and their platform lists over 200 schemes.
Around the software sits a service layer covering the parts most teams dread. Obligation assessment works out what you actually owe, data screening catches problems before filing, and fee modelling makes the cost visible in advance.
Registration management then handles the sign-ups you need with producer responsibility organisations (PROs), national authorities and authorised representatives.
Two limits are worth naming. They handle the registrations but do not submit the compliance reports for you, and they say plastics tax registrations sit outside their scope because that is tax rather than EPR. They cover packaging, electronics, batteries and textiles, and pricing is sales-led.
Choose it over prduct.com if you want the widest scheme library on the market and someone else doing the registrations.
6. Sphera
Sphera goes furthest of anyone here on handing the work over. Their recycling compliance product, EC4P, sits inside a much larger product stewardship suite and covers more than 360 compliance schemes worldwide.
Scope is the headline. EC4P spans packaging, electronics and batteries rather than packaging alone, which makes it the natural pick when your obligations are scattered across waste streams and continents.
Delivery is where it separates from everything above. Sphera's experts carry out the registration and the reporting, and they can pay the recycling fees on your behalf, with one consolidated invoice at the end.
The price of that is a consultant-led implementation and a sales-led purchase, so there is no self-serve route and no published figure.
Choose it over prduct.com if you would rather buy an outcome than run a workflow, across several waste streams and many countries.
Choosing by where your EPR work gets stuck
The useful question is not which platform is best in general, it is which stage of the job is currently costing you time. Find your situation below.
- Suppliers will not send you the data. This is prduct.com's home ground, and Assent does the same job at enterprise scale with a supplier engagement team behind it.
- The data exists but nobody knows what you owe. That is the fee and category work. Repax, Recyda and Assent all produce the numbers, and Lorax EPI will model the fees before you commit.
- You have packaging in several EU countries. Repax and Recyda are both built for this, and our best EPR software for EU compliance roundup compares the wider field.
- Your obligations run past packaging into batteries or electronics. Repax, Lorax EPI and Sphera carry more than one stream, and the best multi-stream EPR software roundup ranks that group.
- The August 2026 packaging declaration is the worry. Repax Declare and Recyda both generate the EU Declaration of Conformity, which almost nothing else on this list does.
- Nobody internally has time to file anything. Sphera will run the whole programme including fee payment, and Lorax EPI will at least take the registrations.
- You want to try something this week. Repax has a free tier and published prices, so a few products can be loaded and reported on before anyone calls you. The best EPR software for small businesses roundup covers the cheaper end properly.
Frequently asked questions about prduct.com alternatives
These are the questions that come up most when producers weigh prduct.com against the rest of the field. Short answers follow.
Is prduct.com any good?
Yes, for the job it is built for. prduct.com is a strong supply chain and compliance data platform, with real depth across a dozen EU and national regulations and a customer list of established Danish manufacturers and retailers.
Its limit is the last stretch of EPR. The platform documents your obligations and keeps the evidence audit-ready, and the fee calculation, the scheme registration and the submission itself are not features it publishes.
Does prduct.com do EPR reporting?
It does the data side of it. prduct.com's own EPR and packaging pages describe collecting supplier and packaging data, tracking composition and recyclability, documenting EPR obligations and generating audit-ready documentation for national and EU authorities.
They do not publish a feature that calculates what you owe each scheme, registers you, or files the declaration. For that you would pair prduct.com with an EPR tool such as Repax, Recyda or Lorax EPI, or move that part of the job to one of them.
What does prduct.com cost?
prduct.com does not publish a price list. There is a free way to get started, and everything beyond that runs through a demo or a conversation, so the figure depends on your supplier count, product volume and which regulations you turn on.
Of the alternatives here, only Repax publishes its prices, with a free tier at 0 EUR a month and paid plans from 29 EUR (ex VAT, as of August 2026).
Is there a cheaper or free alternative to prduct.com?
Repax is the one with a published free tier and public paid plans, so you can start without a sales call and see the reporting before you commit to anything. Complir, Recyda, Assent, Lorax EPI and Sphera are all quote-based or demo-only, which in this market usually means enterprise pricing.
What is the best alternative to prduct.com?
It depends which half of prduct.com you are replacing. Repax is our pick if the EPR return is the problem, because it produces the report and the packaging declaration rather than documenting the obligation.
Complir is the closest match if you want another broad platform, Recyda if packaging is your whole world, and Sphera if you want the entire programme run for you.
Which prduct.com alternative also covers REACH and EUDR?
Complir is the closest, covering product compliance across more than 40 markets, though its published scope centres on product safety and chemicals rather than EPR. Assent and Sphera both sit inside larger product compliance and stewardship suites, so they carry obligations beyond packaging too.
The pure EPR tools here, Repax, Recyda and Lorax EPI, deliberately do not. They cover producer responsibility properly instead of covering everything shallowly, which is why plenty of producers run one of them alongside a platform like prduct.com.
