Repax and Lorax EPI both help producers meet Extended Producer Responsibility obligations, but they are built for different buyers. The right pick depends on your situation, your size, your budget, and whether you want to run compliance yourself or hand it to someone else.
This Repax vs Lorax EPI comparison walks through where each one genuinely leads, feature by feature, so you can weigh them against what actually matters to you.
The two come at the problem from opposite directions. Repax is a software platform you operate yourself. Lorax EPI is a compliance house that can either license you its platform or run the whole job for you.
What Repax and Lorax EPI each are
Repax is an EPR compliance platform you run yourself. You hold your product data once and generate filings and declarations from it.
Two products are live, Core (the product-data and reporting engine) and Declare (the EU Declaration of Conformity), with a third, Comply, on the way for registrations and filings. It is built in Copenhagen and EU-hosted.
Lorax EPI (legally Lorax Compliance) is a UK specialist founded in 2014, based in Rugby, with over 80 compliance specialists and B Corp status. Its platform is called ENVI, and its pitch is "your compliance, taken care of."
Where Repax hands you the controls, Lorax is built to take the work off your plate, either through its software or through its people.
Repax's self-serve model vs Lorax's managed service
This is the biggest difference, so start here. Repax is software your team runs. There is no consultant in the loop, the ops or finance lead sets it up and operates it. That keeps you fast and in control, and it also means Repax does not do the work for you.
Lorax EPI sells two tiers. Its "standard service" is software-only, where you license ENVI and run the reporting yourself, aimed at teams with established internal processes.
Its "outsourced compliance" tier is hands-off: Lorax collects and validates your data, resolves gaps, produces every report, and submits them into the scheme portals for you. Few competitors offer both a clean software-only option and a fully run-for-you option.
So the honest split is control versus hand-holding. Repax if you want to own the workflow, Lorax if you want it run for you, either partly or entirely.
Repax's product-data model vs Lorax's ENVI platform
Repax is product-data-first. You describe a packaging type once, its assemblies, components and materials, and every report is generated from that single record. Update a material once and every product using it carries the change.
Each sale is also frozen at the moment it happens, so a 2024 filing still reconciles in 2027 even after the catalogue moves on. Data comes in through Shopify, WooCommerce, CSV or the API, and reports export as CSV.
Repax Core building a Danish annual packaging report straight from the product data, weight in kg broken down by packaging category, waste destination and waste type, then exported to CSV. The same data answers the next market as a different report.
Lorax's ENVI is pitched as a single source of truth that centralises the scheme rules, timelines, categories and fee structures, then calculates reports automatically from the product data you supply.
The difference is how the data gets in. Lorax leans on a structured Excel data collection template, and on the managed tier its team runs a data screening service that checks your data for missing attributes, wrong classifications and odd weights before it enters ENVI.
Lorax EPI's ENVI, a library of report runs such as recyclability and SKU sales, 269 in this view, each generated from the data loaded into the platform. Screenshot from Lorax's own website.
So Repax maintains a live product-data pipeline, while Lorax wraps expert data preparation around its platform.
Repax's 30+ categories against Lorax's 200+ schemes
Breadth is where Lorax EPI leads. Its site lists over 200 schemes available, spanning packaging, WEEE, batteries, textiles and plastic taxation, and it also tracks voluntary corporate metrics.
Repax covers more than 30 EPR categories across packaging, batteries, electronics and textiles. That is enough for most producers, but for a business filing into hundreds of schemes worldwide at once, Lorax's coverage is wider.
Where Repax Declare and Lorax's services each win
They are strong in different areas, so the best choice comes down to which problem is pressing on you most.
Where Lorax EPI wins
Lorax EPI is strongest across the operational compliance lifecycle, and it packages that as distinct services:
- Obligation assessment reviews what you owe market by market and delivers a structured report.
- Data screening cleans your data before it enters ENVI.
- Registration manages applications with PROs, national authorities and authorised representatives, including retrospective fees.
- Fee modelling forecasts EPR costs across markets.
- Regulatory subscription (ENVI Lite) gives you a searchable portal of global legislation updated monthly, with horizon scanning and webinars.
If your problem is that you sell into many markets and need someone to run and monitor all of that, Lorax is built for it.
Where Repax Declare wins
Repax is strongest on the PPWR wedge and on owning your data. Declare produces the EU Declaration of Conformity that PPWR requires from 12 August 2026. Declare:
- attests Articles 5 to 12,
- generates the signed document with a unique ID, and
- hosts the public page its QR code resolves to for the full 5 or 10 year retention period, tracking versions and views along the way.
Lorax has no dedicated tool for that document. If you want to see the manual side of it, we cover how to create an EU Declaration of Conformity step by step.
Repax has one honest caveat here. Core does not file for you yet, registrations and submissions are Comply's job, and Comply is not live, so today a Repax user still files through each scheme's own channel.
Repax's transparent pricing vs Lorax's enterprise quotes
Repax publishes its pricing. Core and Declare each run free, then €29, then €59 per month, with a 14 day trial and no sales call to start. For a smaller producer that alone can decide it.
Lorax EPI does not publish pricing. Everything runs through a demo request, quoted as an enterprise engagement with consulting, and there is no free tier or self-checkout.
Treat this as posture as of 2026 and confirm with each vendor, but the shapes are clear, self-serve and transparent versus sales-led and bespoke.
Getting started with Repax vs Lorax EPI
Because Repax is self-serve, you can be building the same afternoon, and your own team runs it from there. There is no implementation project, and equally, nobody to hand it to.
Lorax EPI is an enterprise engagement. Onboarding involves configuring ENVI to your portfolio and, on the managed tier, its specialists doing the data work and the filing. Slower to start, but you carry less of the load yourself.
Repax and Lorax EPI side by side
Here is the whole comparison in one view. Every cell reflects each vendor's own current information.
| Repax | Lorax EPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded and base | 2026, Copenhagen (EU) | 2014, Rugby (UK) |
| Delivery | Software your team runs | Software-only or fully outsourced |
| Coverage | 30+ EPR categories | 200+ schemes |
| Streams | Packaging, batteries, electronics, textiles | Packaging, WEEE, batteries, textiles, plastic tax |
| Data model | Product-data-first, spec once | ENVI rules engine, Excel-based intake |
| Files for you | Not yet, Comply is coming | Yes, submits into scheme portals |
| PPWR EU DoC | Yes, Declare is live | No dedicated tool |
| Regulatory monitoring | Not a separate product | ENVI Lite portal, updated monthly |
| Pricing, 2026 | Public, free then €29 then €59 per month | Demo only, no public price |
| Best for | Producers who want to own it | Enterprises who want it outsourced |
Should you pick Repax or Lorax EPI
Match the tool to your situation.
- You want a platform your team runs and you want to start without procurement: Repax. Transparent pricing and self-serve setup fit a mid-market producer.
- Your near-term pressure is the EU Declaration of Conformity under PPWR: Repax. Declare is built for that document, from signing to hosted retention.
- You file into many schemes across many markets and want it run for you: Lorax EPI. Its breadth and managed service are built for that.
- You need obligation assessment, fee forecasting or registrations handled by specialists: Lorax EPI.
Repax vs Lorax EPI questions answered
A few of the specific questions that come up when producers weigh these two.
Is Repax or Lorax EPI better for EPR compliance?
For most producers, Repax, because it is a platform you run yourself, with transparent pricing and the PPWR Declaration of Conformity built in. Lorax EPI is the stronger choice for a large enterprise that needs the widest scheme coverage and wants the filing handled as a managed service.
What is the difference between Repax and Lorax EPI?
Repax is product-data-first software your team operates, with Core and Declare live. Lorax EPI is a UK compliance specialist whose ENVI platform you can license, or whose team can run your data, reporting and filing end to end across over 200 schemes.
Does Lorax EPI file EPR reports for you?
Yes. On its outsourced tier Lorax collects and validates your data, produces the reports and submits them into the scheme portals, and it manages registrations with PROs and authorities. Repax does not file for you yet, that is the job of Comply, which is not live.
What is ENVI and how does it differ from Repax?
ENVI is Lorax EPI's platform. It centralises scheme rules, timelines and fee structures and calculates reports from data you prepare, often through an Excel template screened by Lorax's team. Repax instead holds your product data natively and generates each report from that single record.
Is Repax or Lorax EPI cheaper?
Repax publishes pricing, free then €29 then €59 per month, and starts without a sales call. Lorax EPI is demo-only and quoted as an enterprise engagement, so cost depends on your scope. Treat this as 2026 posture and confirm with each vendor.
Which is better for a small business?
Repax. Its free tier, transparent pricing and self-serve setup suit a smaller producer who wants to be compliant without a sales call, and the product-data model grows with you. Lorax EPI is built around enterprise engagements, usually more than a small business needs.
Does Repax cover as many schemes as Lorax EPI?
No. Lorax EPI lists over 200 schemes, which is its main strength. Repax covers more than 30 EPR categories, enough for most producers but narrower than Lorax for filing into hundreds of schemes at once.
The EU regulation behind the declaration is on EUR-Lex, and the European Commission keeps an overview on its packaging waste pages.
