Repax vs prduct.com is a choice between two sizes of problem. prduct.com is a supply chain platform that documents more than twenty regulations, and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is one of them. Repax covers EPR and the packaging conformity paperwork that comes with it, nothing else.
For EPR reporting itself, Repax is the better choice, because all of it exists to turn product data into a return a scheme accepts.
prduct.com is the better choice when EPR is one line in a wider supplier programme that also answers deforestation, chemicals and due diligence.
Who ends up using each one
These two platforms get bought by different people inside a company, and that tells you most of what you need to know.
prduct.com organises its site around a sustainability manager, a purchasing manager and an IT manager. The customers they name are furniture, building materials and food businesses such as BoConcept, Fredericia and REMA 1000.
Those are companies with long supplier lists and a compliance programme that has to answer several rules at once.
Repax is built for the person who got handed EPR without asking for it. Usually the operations or finance lead, sometimes the founder, almost never a specialist.
That problem is narrower and harder to postpone. A packaging EPR deadline in one market does not wait while you build a supplier programme.
So the useful question is not which one is better software. It is which of those two jobs is yours this year.
Repax vs prduct.com comparison table
Both companies publish what they cover, so the table below sets the two side by side, one criterion at a time, from packaging EPR through to what each one costs. Pricing is as it stands in mid 2026.
| What you need | Repax | prduct.com |
|---|---|---|
| Packaging EPR data and reporting | The core job. One product record produces the numbers a scheme asks for | Covered as a reporting topic, with supplier data collection, packaging composition and audit-ready documentation |
| Batteries, electronics, textiles and other streams | 30+ EPR categories run off the same product record | The Battery Regulation and WEEE have their own pages, handled as documentation |
| PPWR Declaration of Conformity | Declare produces one you can issue yourself | Not listed as a feature |
| Submitting the filing | You submit from what Repax produces. Comply, which handles registrations and submissions, is coming in 2026 | Not listed, and no scheme, register or PRO is named on their EPR page |
| Getting data out of suppliers | Not what we do. You hold your own product spec | Their strongest ground. A supplier data pool, collaboration, scorecards and certificate tracking |
| Deforestation (EUDR) | Not covered | Covered, including a TRACES integration for due diligence statements |
| Chemicals (REACH and CLP) | Not covered | Covered |
| Digital Product Passport | Not covered | Covered |
| CSRD and ESG reporting | Not covered | Covered, alongside GHG Protocol and ISO 14001 |
| Markets and language | Global, EU-built and EU-hosted, English | EU-focused, a Danish company, English and Danish |
| Pricing | Public. Free at €0 a month, paid plans from €29 a month, enterprise for high volume (ex VAT, as of July 2026) | No published prices. A free sign-up and a freemium option, then a demo |
| Best for | Producers whose deliverable is a filed EPR return | Companies running a wide supplier compliance programme |
The shape of that comparison is the whole story. prduct.com is wide, and EPR is one item on a long list. Repax is deep in that single item and absent from everything else.
The ground only prduct.com covers
prduct.com's pitch is that one platform can answer the whole shelf of rules a product carries now, and their site backs that up.
Five things they do that Repax does not attempt. Several of them fall under due diligence, which in practice means checking what your suppliers actually do, from where timber was cut to whether forced labour was involved, and being able to prove you checked.
- They get facts out of your suppliers. A supplier data pool collects and standardises what suppliers send, with collaboration, scorecards and certificate tracking around it. If your real problem is that the material facts live in other companies' inboxes, that is the problem they built for.
- Due diligence is a workflow, not a document. The EU due diligence directive, the German supply chain act, the Norwegian Transparency Act and the forced labour ban are all covered, with policy management and mitigation plans attached to them.
- Deforestation comes with the filing route built in. EUDR gets its own module, including an integration with TRACES, the EU system those due diligence statements are submitted to.
- Whole regulations sit outside Repax. Chemicals under REACH and CLP, the Digital Product Passport, right to repair, ecodesign and CSRD reporting. If any of those are live for you, Repax has nothing to say about them.
- They are Danish, in Danish. Site and support in Danish and English, guided onboarding with a named success manager, a help centre and video courses. Worth something if you are a Danish company with several frameworks landing at once, since packaging rules in Denmark started biting in October 2025.
Their EPR page is the one place where the wide net shows its price. It describes managing product data, staying audit-ready and sharing EPR data with stakeholders.
What it does not describe is calculating a fee, registering with a scheme or submitting a return, and it names no country and no scheme. So the last mile, where a number becomes a filed return, stays with you or with a consultant.
The ground only Repax covers
Repax starts from the thing an EPR return is actually made of, which is a product broken down into components with real weights. It is our own product, which is why it leads here, though we would rather be straight about where prduct.com wins than pretend the two overlap more than they do.
Four things you only get on this side.
- A data model built for EPR arithmetic. Repax Core holds assemblies and components with weights, so a packaging unit adds up to a number rather than an estimate. That is the difference between having supplier documents and having a figure you can file.
- One record, many obligations. The same product answers packaging, batteries, electronics and textiles across 30+ EPR categories. Add a market and you apply its fields, you do not start a new dataset.
- A conformity declaration you can issue yourself. Repax Declare produces the EU Declaration of Conformity that PPWR requires for packaging, without a consultant drafting it for you.
- A price you can read before you speak to anyone. The Core plans start free and go to €29 a month, so you can size the tool the same afternoon you find it.
Two limits are worth stating plainly. Repax stops at EPR and packaging conformity, so nothing here suggests it answers deforestation, chemicals, a product passport or CSRD.
And Repax Comply, the part that registers you with schemes and submits filings, is not released yet. Today Repax gets the return ready and you send it.
What it costs to run each one
Only one of these two publishes a price, so this is a short section.
Repax is public. Core and Declare are each free at €0 a month, then €29 a month on Growth and €59 a month on Pro, with a custom enterprise tier for high volume. Prices are ex VAT, as of July 2026, and the free tier needs no conversation with us at all.
prduct.com lists no prices anywhere on their site. They invite you to start for free and describe a freemium option, and beyond that the route is a demo.
Their onboarding is guided rather than self-serve, with a structured programme, a help centre and a named success manager. That suits a wide rollout across departments.
That gap is not only about money. A published price means you can size a tool in an afternoon. A quote means the timeline belongs to somebody else's calendar.
Which one your compliance programme needs
Route yourself by what is actually on your desk, not by which platform looks bigger.
- You file packaging EPR in more than one market. Repax. The returns are the work, and that is what it is shaped for.
- You need a packaging Declaration of Conformity you can issue yourself. Repax, through Declare.
- You also report batteries, electronics or textiles. Repax. One product record covers every stream instead of one dataset per rule.
- Your hard part is getting data out of suppliers. prduct.com. Certificates, origins and material facts arriving from other companies is their home ground.
- EUDR, chemicals or due diligence are live for you this year. prduct.com. Repax does not cover any of them.
- You want to see a price and start today. Repax. Free tier, no demo required.
- You are Danish, with several frameworks landing at once and a preference for Danish-language support. prduct.com.
Read that list and you may find you belong on both sides. That is a real answer, not a fudge, and the next section draws the line.
Where one platform stops and the other starts
The clean boundary between these two is the deliverable, not the feature list.
If what you owe someone is a documented supply chain (where a material came from, which supplier certified what, whether a due diligence statement holds up), that is prduct.com's ground and Repax offers nothing there.
If what you owe someone is a return a scheme accepts and a conformity declaration a customer can ask for, that is ours. For that job Repax is the better choice, because the whole product is built backwards from the filing.
Plenty of companies genuinely sit on both sides of that line. prduct.com upstream for supplier facts and Repax downstream for EPR filings is a sensible setup, and a better one than asking either platform to do the other's job badly.
Frequently asked questions about Repax and prduct.com
Short answers to what producers ask when they are weighing these two.
Is Repax or prduct.com better for EPR reporting?
Repax, for EPR reporting itself. It is built around the product record an EPR return is calculated from, and it produces a scheme-shaped report plus a packaging Declaration of Conformity.
prduct.com covers EPR as one of more than twenty frameworks, focused on collecting supplier data and keeping documentation audit-ready.
Does prduct.com do EPR?
Yes, as one topic among many. prduct.com lists EPR and packaging waste under reporting, alongside CSRD, the GHG Protocol and ISO 14001, and describes managing product data, staying audit-ready and sharing EPR data with stakeholders.
Their site does not list fee calculation, scheme registration or submitting a return, and it names no specific country or scheme.
What does prduct.com cost?
They do not publish prices. Their site offers a free sign-up and mentions a freemium option, and any real number comes from a demo. Repax publishes its pricing instead, with a free tier at €0 a month and paid plans from €29 a month, ex VAT, as of July 2026.
Does Repax cover EUDR or the Digital Product Passport?
No. Repax covers EPR across waste streams plus the packaging Declaration of Conformity under PPWR.
Deforestation, chemicals under REACH, product passports, right to repair and CSRD are all outside it, and those are exactly the areas where prduct.com is the stronger platform.
Does Repax file my EPR report for me?
Not today. Repax Core prepares the data and the report, and you submit it to the scheme. Repax Comply, which will handle registrations and submissions, is coming in 2026 and is not released yet.
Can you use Repax and prduct.com together?
Yes, and for some companies that is the right answer. prduct.com handles the upstream work of collecting and verifying supplier data across many regulations, while Repax turns product data into EPR returns and conformity declarations.
They solve different halves of the job rather than competing for the same one.
